Divorce Cases Lawyer in Delhi. – Satprakash Meena vs Alka Meena (July 7, 2021): The Delhi High Court ruled that the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, would apply to the Meena community (a notified Scheduled Tribe in Rajasthan) if they follow Hindu customs and practices. – Labishwar Manjhi v. Pran Manjhi and Ors. (2000): The Supreme Court ruled that the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, would apply to the Santhal tribe (a notified Scheduled Tribe) if they follow Hindu customs, despite being a notified tribe. – Dr. Surajmani Stella Kujur v. Durga Charan Hansdah and Anr. (2001): The Supreme Court ruled that the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, would not apply to members of a notified Scheduled Tribe, even if they follow Hindu customs. – Om Prakash v. Lalita Meena (2015): The Rajasthan High Court ruled that the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, would apply to the Meena community (a notified Scheduled Tribe in Rajasthan) if they follow Hindu customs and practices. – Yamanaji H. Jadhav v. Nirmala (2002): The Supreme Court ruled that the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, would apply to a couple who followed Hindu customs, despite the husband’s claim that he was a Christian. – Subramani and Ors. v. M. Chandralekha (2005): The Supreme Court ruled that the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, would apply to a couple who followed Hindu customs, despite the wife’s claim that she was a Christian. – Mirza Raja Pushpavathi Vijayaram Gajapathi Raj Manne Sultan Bahadur and Ors. v. Pushavathi Visweswar Gajapathiraj and Ors. (1954):

#divorcecaseslawyerindelhi

#familymatterscaseslawyerindelhi

#matrimonialdispiuteslawyerindelhi

#lawfirmindelhi

#lawyerindelhi

#advocateindelhi